CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a claim for workers' compensation benefits for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained on June 18, 2001. The primary issue is whether the applicant's injury meets the "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" exception to the six-month employment requirement for psychiatric claims under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found the Workers' Compensation Judge applied an incorrect "taint of fraud" standard and needs to re-evaluate whether the incident was truly uncommon, unusual, and unexpected. Furthermore, the Board directed the Judge to address issues of symptom magnification and malingering raised by the psychiatric reports.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a claim for workers' compensation benefits for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained on June 18, 2001. The primary issue is whether the applicant's injury meets the "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" exception to the six-month employment requirement for psychiatric claims under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found the Workers' Compensation Judge applied an incorrect "taint of fraud" standard and needs to re-evaluate whether the incident was truly uncommon, unusual, and unexpected. Furthermore, the Board directed the Judge to address issues of symptom magnification and malingering raised by the psychiatric reports.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.