CompFox AI Summary
The OHI Workers' Compensation Trust became insolvent, accumulating an $8.27 million deficit. The New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, as plaintiff and successor in interest, sued several entities including Fuller & LaFiura, CPAs, P.C., Cody Management, and individual trustees for various claims such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence. This cross-appeal addresses Supreme Court's partial dismissal of claims and application of statutes of limitations. The Appellate Division reversed the dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty claim against Fuller, affirmed the dismissal of common-law indemnification and good faith/fair dealing claims, and modified the application of statutes of limitations for other claims, deeming continuous representation and equitable estoppel doctrines inapplicable.
New York State Workers' Compensation Board v. Fuller & LaFiura, CPAs, P.C. is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The OHI Workers' Compensation Trust became insolvent, accumulating an $8.27 million deficit. The New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, as plaintiff and successor in interest, sued several entities including Fuller & LaFiura, CPAs, P.C., Cody Management, and individual trustees for various claims such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence. This cross-appeal addresses Supreme Court's partial dismissal of claims and application of statutes of limitations. The Appellate Division reversed the dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty claim against Fuller, affirmed the dismissal of common-law indemnification and good faith/fair dealing claims, and modified the application of statutes of limitations for other claims, deeming continuous representation and equitable estoppel doctrines inapplicable.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.