Home/Case Law/NOE ALVAREZ vs. CALIFORNIA THREAD & SUPPLY INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

NOE ALVAREZ vs. CALIFORNIA THREAD & SUPPLY INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE INSURANCE

Filed: Nov 14, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2931131 (MON 0357107)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's second petition for reconsideration as it was a successive filing, which is not permitted. Such petitions are considered improper and must be filed as a writ of review with the Court of Appeals. Additionally, the petition would have been dismissed as untimely, as it was filed well beyond the 25-day limit. The WCAB reiterated that a prior decision denying reconsideration is not subject to a further petition for reconsideration.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's second petition for reconsideration as it was a successive filing, which is not permitted. Such petitions are considered improper and must be filed as a writ of review with the Court of Appeals. Additionally, the petition would have been dismissed as untimely, as it was filed well beyond the 25-day limit. The WCAB reiterated that a prior decision denying reconsideration is not subject to a further petition for reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

NOE ALVAREZ vs. CALIFORNIA THREAD & SUPPLY INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE INSURANCE (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox