Home/Case Law/NOE VASQUEZ vs. IN AND OUT REMOVAL, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

NOE VASQUEZ vs. IN AND OUT REMOVAL, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Oct 19, 2012
Los Angeles
ADJ7452074 ADJ7452514

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to prove the applicant was employed by the defendant on the date of injury or that the claimed injuries arose out of and in the course of employment. The Board also noted potential ethical concerns regarding the lien claimant's counsel, who also represented the applicant, and admonished counsel for misrepresenting evidence. The denial was based on the WCJ's report and the record, which did not support the lien claimant's arguments.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to prove the applicant was employed by the defendant on the date of injury or that the claimed injuries arose out of and in the course of employment. The Board also noted potential ethical concerns regarding the lien claimant's counsel, who also represented the applicant, and admonished counsel for misrepresenting evidence. The denial was based on the WCJ's report and the record, which did not support the lien claimant's arguments.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.