CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the administrative law judge's order to take the matter off calendar was not a final order. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The defendant had argued the order allowing further discovery violated due process and labor code provisions. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, deeming it an extraordinary remedy not warranted in this instance.
NORINE CARRIER-RUSSEAU vs. LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the administrative law judge's order to take the matter off calendar was not a final order. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The defendant had argued the order allowing further discovery violated due process and labor code provisions. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, deeming it an extraordinary remedy not warranted in this instance.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.