Home/Case Law/Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371
Regular Panel Decision DecisionSmall Claims Action

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371

Civil Court of the City of New York
SCR No. 40/12; SCR No. 41/12

CompFox AI Summary

This small claims action, consolidated for trial, involved two former union staff members, Aubrey Norris and Reuben Adeshuko, suing SSEU Local 371 for alleged underpayment of severance. Claimants argued that a long-standing union practice entitled them to three weeks' severance pay upon termination, but they only received two weeks after new leadership took over on May 2, 2011. The defendant contended that the standard policy was two weeks' severance and that the new leadership formally instituted this policy on May 4, 2011. The court found no written severance policy, which violated Labor Law § 195, and concluded that the credible evidence supported the claimants' reliance on a three-week severance practice. The judgment was entered in favor of the claimants for the outstanding severance amount plus interest.

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371 is a workers' compensation case decided in Civil Court of the City of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Civil Court of the City of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This small claims action, consolidated for trial, involved two former union staff members, Aubrey Norris and Reuben Adeshuko, suing SSEU Local 371 for alleged underpayment of severance. Claimants argued that a long-standing union practice entitled them to three weeks' severance pay upon termination, but they only received two weeks after new leadership took over on May 2, 2011. The defendant contended that the standard policy was two weeks' severance and that the new leadership formally instituted this policy on May 4, 2011. The court found no written severance policy, which violated Labor Law § 195, and concluded that the credible evidence supported the claimants' reliance on a three-week severance practice. The judgment was entered in favor of the claimants for the outstanding severance amount plus interest.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371 workers compensation case in Civil Court of the City of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371 case law summary from Civil Court of the City of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371 Case Analysis

Norris v. Social Services Employee Union 371 is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Civil Court of the City of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.