Home/Case Law/Notal HORDAGODA vs. JAMES S. NEIL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Notal HORDAGODA vs. JAMES S. NEIL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 30, 2007
San Francisco
SJO 0246192 SJO 0252436

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the Administrative Law Judge's decision, upholding the award of medical treatment and admitting the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator's reports. While the Board clarified that ACOEM guidelines are not exclusive to acute spinal conditions, they affirmed the awarded treatment was supported by substantial evidence. The Board found no violation of Labor Code section 4062.3 regarding applicant's communication with the QME, as it was in the course of examination.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the Administrative Law Judge's decision, upholding the award of medical treatment and admitting the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator's reports. While the Board clarified that ACOEM guidelines are not exclusive to acute spinal conditions, they affirmed the awarded treatment was supported by substantial evidence. The Board found no violation of Labor Code section 4062.3 regarding applicant's communication with the QME, as it was in the course of examination.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Notal HORDAGODA vs. JAMES S. NEIL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox