Home/Case Law/PAMELA SMITH vs. HYATT REGENCY, NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAMELA SMITH vs. HYATT REGENCY, NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Sep 30, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ6786767

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal related to a workers' compensation claim for cumulative back injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration, finding the WCJ's order to further develop the record was not a final, appealable decision. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, as the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's decision to reject medical opinions from Dr. Kaplan due to inconsistencies and lack of substantial evidence was upheld, supporting the need for further record development.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal related to a workers' compensation claim for cumulative back injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration, finding the WCJ's order to further develop the record was not a final, appealable decision. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, as the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's decision to reject medical opinions from Dr. Kaplan due to inconsistencies and lack of substantial evidence was upheld, supporting the need for further record development.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.