PARK EDDY vs. ACTIVE CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT, ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The case involved an applicant who sustained industrial injuries and required overnight home healthcare. The central issue was whether the applicant's spouse was appropriate to provide this care. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) found that the spouse was capable and suitable, relying on their credible testimony and existing case law. The defendant challenged this finding, arguing insufficient medical evidence and questioning the spouse's ability while working. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that the record supported the need for non-skilled attendant care and that the spouse was capable of providing it, noting that the spouse was not currently employed.