CompFox AI Summary
Lien claimant Kenneth R. Mackie, applicant's former attorney, sought reconsideration of an order that reimbursed him for vocational expert evaluation costs but deferred penalties. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, finding that Labor Code section 4622(a) was not applicable to the lien claimant. The Board affirmed the WCJ's amended order, but further amended it to defer both interest and penalties until the end of the case in chief.
PATRICIA OROZCO vs. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PROCENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Fresno. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fresno.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Lien claimant Kenneth R. Mackie, applicant's former attorney, sought reconsideration of an order that reimbursed him for vocational expert evaluation costs but deferred penalties. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, finding that Labor Code section 4622(a) was not applicable to the lien claimant. The Board affirmed the WCJ's amended order, but further amended it to defer both interest and penalties until the end of the case in chief.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.