Home/Case Law/Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This post-divorce action addresses a father's request to reduce child support following the emancipation of the older child. The mother opposed this, citing the younger child's extracurricular expenses and the father's infrequent visitation, and also sought payment for unpaid child support from 2002. The trial court initially granted the father a reduction, established a new parenting plan with reduced visitation, and included an upward deviation in child support for the younger child, while also finding the father in willful civil contempt for the 2002 arrearage. On appeal, the decision was largely affirmed, but the finding of willful contempt was reversed due to the father's injury-related unemployment in 2002. Additionally, the appellate court mandated prejudgment interest on the child support arrearage from 2002 and remanded the case for a determination of the mother's appellate attorney fees.

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This post-divorce action addresses a father's request to reduce child support following the emancipation of the older child. The mother opposed this, citing the younger child's extracurricular expenses and the father's infrequent visitation, and also sought payment for unpaid child support from 2002. The trial court initially granted the father a reduction, established a new parenting plan with reduced visitation, and included an upward deviation in child support for the younger child, while also finding the father in willful civil contempt for the 2002 arrearage. On appeal, the decision was largely affirmed, but the finding of willful contempt was reversed due to the father's injury-related unemployment in 2002. Additionally, the appellate court mandated prejudgment interest on the child support arrearage from 2002 and remanded the case for a determination of the mother's appellate attorney fees.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder Case Analysis

Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.