CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a previous award finding the applicant sustained 66% permanent disability. The defendant employer argued the original award relied on an incorrect permanent and stationary date provided by the Agreed Medical Examiner (AME), who later admitted his initial report was in error. The Board agreed that the medical record needed further development due to the AME's admitted error and the resulting inaccurate permanent and stationary date. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including the defendant's opportunity to challenge the impairment rating under AMA Guidelines and diminished future earning capacity.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a previous award finding the applicant sustained 66% permanent disability. The defendant employer argued the original award relied on an incorrect permanent and stationary date provided by the Agreed Medical Examiner (AME), who later admitted his initial report was in error. The Board agreed that the medical record needed further development due to the AME's admitted error and the resulting inaccurate permanent and stationary date. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including the defendant's opportunity to challenge the impairment rating under AMA Guidelines and diminished future earning capacity.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.