Home/Case Law/PAUL HUNT vs. BIGGE CRANE & RIGGING
Regular DecisionDecision After Remittitur

PAUL HUNT vs. BIGGE CRANE & RIGGING

Filed: Dec 24, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3495329 (SFO 0461473)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant seeking additional compensation for an industrial injury based on the employer's alleged serious and willful misconduct. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) initially found the employer liable, citing the misconduct of a crane operator and general foreman deemed "managing officers." However, the Court of Appeal reversed this decision, finding neither individual constituted a managing officer whose actions could establish employer misconduct. Consequently, the WCAB has amended its prior award, denying the applicant's claim for serious and willful misconduct.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant seeking additional compensation for an industrial injury based on the employer's alleged serious and willful misconduct. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) initially found the employer liable, citing the misconduct of a crane operator and general foreman deemed "managing officers." However, the Court of Appeal reversed this decision, finding neither individual constituted a managing officer whose actions could establish employer misconduct. Consequently, the WCAB has amended its prior award, denying the applicant's claim for serious and willful misconduct.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.