Home/Case Law/PAUL MANVELYAN vs. BROADSPIRE CLAIM SERVICE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAUL MANVELYAN vs. BROADSPIRE CLAIM SERVICE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION

Filed: Aug 27, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ1153742

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a lien claimant seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision. The WCAB affirmed the judge's finding that the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) is not liable for interest on a medical lien, despite the claimant being an assignee. The Board adopted the judge's report, incorporating its reasoning, and denied the petition for reconsideration. The Board also admonished the lien claimant for using disrespectful language towards the judge in her petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a lien claimant seeking reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision. The WCAB affirmed the judge's finding that the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) is not liable for interest on a medical lien, despite the claimant being an assignee. The Board adopted the judge's report, incorporating its reasoning, and denied the petition for reconsideration. The Board also admonished the lien claimant for using disrespectful language towards the judge in her petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAUL MANVELYAN vs. BROADSPIRE CLAIM SERVICE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox