Home/Case Law/PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency

Filed: May 21, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ6798938, ADJ6798837, ADJ6798976, ADJ5801676

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves applicant Paul Marquis's workers' compensation claims for orthopedic and cardiovascular injuries. Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of the original award, raising issues of permanent disability calculation and apportionment of injuries. The Appeals Board granted both petitions, rescinded the original award, and returned the case to the WCJ for a new decision. This decision clarifies that apportionment was improperly applied to the applicant's cardiovascular injury due to a misapplication of causation versus disability, but found Dr. Brourman's apportionment of the right shoulder injury to be appropriate given the evidence.

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves applicant Paul Marquis's workers' compensation claims for orthopedic and cardiovascular injuries. Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of the original award, raising issues of permanent disability calculation and apportionment of injuries. The Appeals Board granted both petitions, rescinded the original award, and returned the case to the WCJ for a new decision. This decision clarifies that apportionment was improperly applied to the applicant's cardiovascular injury due to a misapplication of causation versus disability, but found Dr. Brourman's apportionment of the right shoulder injury to be appropriate given the evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency Case Analysis

PAUL MARQUIS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.