Home/Case Law/PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration Decision

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 24, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ1298814 (SBR 0335316)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board amended a prior award to deny the applicant's claim for psychiatric injury, finding it barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(j) as an inmate's claim sustained during incarceration. However, the Board affirmed the finding that the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule applies, based on a pre-2005 treating physician's report indicating permanent disability. Issues regarding further injury to the neurological system, headaches, balance, and eyes, along with permanent disability, apportionment, and medical treatment, were deferred for further development of the record. The Board noted that any prior stipulation to the 2005 Schedule was waived by the defendant's failure to raise it on reconsideration.

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board amended a prior award to deny the applicant's claim for psychiatric injury, finding it barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(j) as an inmate's claim sustained during incarceration. However, the Board affirmed the finding that the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule applies, based on a pre-2005 treating physician's report indicating permanent disability. Issues regarding further injury to the neurological system, headaches, balance, and eyes, along with permanent disability, apportionment, and medical treatment, were deferred for further development of the record. The Board noted that any prior stipulation to the 2005 Schedule was waived by the defendant's failure to raise it on reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

PAUL MATHENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.