CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant who sustained left knee and right great toe injuries while employed by Walmart. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's (WCJ) decision regarding permanent disability. The Board found that the WCJ improperly made his own apportionment determination instead of relying on the QME's opinion, which was deemed substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the Board amended the award to reflect 37% permanent partial disability, increasing the applicant's indemnity and adjusting the attorney's fee accordingly.
PAUL PENNINGTON vs. WALMART STORE, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant who sustained left knee and right great toe injuries while employed by Walmart. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's (WCJ) decision regarding permanent disability. The Board found that the WCJ improperly made his own apportionment determination instead of relying on the QME's opinion, which was deemed substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the Board amended the award to reflect 37% permanent partial disability, increasing the applicant's indemnity and adjusting the attorney's fee accordingly.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.