Home/Case Law/PEDRO GUARDADO vs. PEACOCK CHEESE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

PEDRO GUARDADO vs. PEACOCK CHEESE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jun 08, 2015
Marina Del Rey
ADJ8703917

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns defendant Peacock Cheese Distributing Company's petition for removal, seeking a bifurcated trial on the statute of limitations before applicant's injury is established. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, finding the request premature as the defendant still disputes the applicant's injury. The Board agreed with the Administrative Law Judge that bifurcating the statute of limitations defense prior to injury acceptance is akin to a prohibited request for judgment on the pleadings. Consequently, the defendant's petition for removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns defendant Peacock Cheese Distributing Company's petition for removal, seeking a bifurcated trial on the statute of limitations before applicant's injury is established. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, finding the request premature as the defendant still disputes the applicant's injury. The Board agreed with the Administrative Law Judge that bifurcating the statute of limitations defense prior to injury acceptance is akin to a prohibited request for judgment on the pleadings. Consequently, the defendant's petition for removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.