Home/Case Law/PEDRO RIVADENEYRA vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PEDRO RIVADENEYRA vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: Mar 29, 2019
San Francisco
ADJ10851942

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pedro Rivadeneyra's Petition for Reconsideration and dismissed his Petition for Removal. The Board found that the sole issue challenged, treatment outside the Medical Provider Network (MPN), was an interlocutory order. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which was not demonstrated here. Reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision were to issue.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pedro Rivadeneyra's Petition for Reconsideration and dismissed his Petition for Removal. The Board found that the sole issue challenged, treatment outside the Medical Provider Network (MPN), was an interlocutory order. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which was not demonstrated here. Reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision were to issue.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.