CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied George Huang's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the original decision that the deceased was an employee of Mr. Huang and suffered a compensable death. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, finding that Mr. Huang failed to demonstrate why newly discovered evidence, primarily consisting of bank records and a declaration from his sister, could not have been presented earlier with reasonable diligence. Furthermore, Mr. Huang's claims of fraud and misunderstanding of the proceedings were rejected, as he had been repeatedly advised to seek legal representation and had attended prior conferences. The Board also noted that Mr. Huang's supplemental filings did not meet procedural requirements.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied George Huang's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the original decision that the deceased was an employee of Mr. Huang and suffered a compensable death. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, finding that Mr. Huang failed to demonstrate why newly discovered evidence, primarily consisting of bank records and a declaration from his sister, could not have been presented earlier with reasonable diligence. Furthermore, Mr. Huang's claims of fraud and misunderstanding of the proceedings were rejected, as he had been repeatedly advised to seek legal representation and had attended prior conferences. The Board also noted that Mr. Huang's supplemental filings did not meet procedural requirements.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.