CompFox AI Summary
The petitioner mother appealed two Family Court orders concerning child custody and supervised visitation. The first order awarded custody to the father with the mother's visitation supervised by Virginia Cordero. The second order modified the first, stipulating supervision by a professional child care worker. The appeal from the visitation supervision by Virginia Cordero in the first order was dismissed as superseded. The remaining part of the first order and the second order were affirmed. The court emphasized the child's best interest, found the custody award to the father to be in conformity with the evidence, and rejected the mother's arguments regarding supervised visitation and the failure to appoint a law guardian.
Pero v. Musolino is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The petitioner mother appealed two Family Court orders concerning child custody and supervised visitation. The first order awarded custody to the father with the mother's visitation supervised by Virginia Cordero. The second order modified the first, stipulating supervision by a professional child care worker. The appeal from the visitation supervision by Virginia Cordero in the first order was dismissed as superseded. The remaining part of the first order and the second order were affirmed. The court emphasized the child's best interest, found the custody award to the father to be in conformity with the evidence, and rejected the mother's arguments regarding supervised visitation and the failure to appoint a law guardian.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.