CompFox AI Summary
The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Employment Security from a Chancery Court judgment that reversed a denial of unemployment benefits to Joe A. Perryman. Perryman was discharged by Heil-Quaker Corporation for excessive absenteeism and failure to notify his employer. An arbitrator later modified his discharge to a three-day suspension, leading the Chancellor to find that Perryman was not discharged and thus eligible for benefits. However, the appellate court ruled that the Commissioner is not bound by an arbitrator's decision regarding unemployment compensation eligibility, emphasizing it as a matter between the state and the employee. Finding material evidence to support the Board of Review's decision that Perryman was discharged for misconduct, the court reversed the Chancellor's judgment, denying Perryman unemployment benefits.
Perryman v. Bible is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Employment Security from a Chancery Court judgment that reversed a denial of unemployment benefits to Joe A. Perryman. Perryman was discharged by Heil-Quaker Corporation for excessive absenteeism and failure to notify his employer. An arbitrator later modified his discharge to a three-day suspension, leading the Chancellor to find that Perryman was not discharged and thus eligible for benefits. However, the appellate court ruled that the Commissioner is not bound by an arbitrator's decision regarding unemployment compensation eligibility, emphasizing it as a matter between the state and the employee. Finding material evidence to support the Board of Review's decision that Perryman was discharged for misconduct, the court reversed the Chancellor's judgment, denying Perryman unemployment benefits.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.