CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Peter Morall's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order. Such orders, concerning procedural or evidentiary matters, do not determine substantive rights and are therefore not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the petition for removal, adopting the Workers' Compensation Judge's report and finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. This order means the petition did not proceed on its merits at this stage.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Peter Morall's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order. Such orders, concerning procedural or evidentiary matters, do not determine substantive rights and are therefore not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the petition for removal, adopting the Workers' Compensation Judge's report and finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. This order means the petition did not proceed on its merits at this stage.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.