CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Phyllis Carson's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final interlocutory order that did not determine substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied Carson's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's report adequately explained why these petitions were not granted. Ultimately, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Phyllis Carson's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final interlocutory order that did not determine substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied Carson's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's report adequately explained why these petitions were not granted. Ultimately, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.