Home/Case Law/PIK SAN CHAN vs. KOI PALACE, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY
Regular Decision

PIK SAN CHAN vs. KOI PALACE, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY

Filed: May 02, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ 9938554

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which the Board adopted, stated the applicant's decision addressed only an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue. The applicant's attorney was admonished for unprofessional comments.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which the Board adopted, stated the applicant's decision addressed only an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue. The applicant's attorney was admonished for unprofessional comments.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PIK SAN CHAN vs. KOI PALACE, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY (2016) – San Francisco | CompFox