CompFox AI Summary
The WCAB dismissed SCIF's petition for removal because the June 6, 2013 order was not a final order. A prior order dated April 25, 2013, dismissing lien claims, was labeled proposed and remained ambiguous. The WCJ's subsequent rescission of that order was permissible as it was merely a notice of a future final order. As SCIF was not aggrieved by the rescission of a non-final order, their petition was dismissed.
PORFIRIO ABRAJAN vs. JOSE OCHOA FARM LABOR SERVICES, INC., VARIOUS EMPLOYERS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The WCAB dismissed SCIF's petition for removal because the June 6, 2013 order was not a final order. A prior order dated April 25, 2013, dismissing lien claims, was labeled "proposed" and remained ambiguous. The WCJ's subsequent rescission of that order was permissible as it was merely a notice of a future final order. As SCIF was not aggrieved by the rescission of a non-final order, their petition was dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.