Home/Case Law/Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppellate Court Decision

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

The Upjohn Company appealed judgments in favor of Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. and MiChris, Inc. after a fire destroyed a building insulated with Upjohn's product. Plaintiffs sued for strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and fraud, alleging inadequate warnings about the insulation's flammability. The appellate court found that while the statute of limitations could apply, the jury's finding of fraud and concealment by Upjohn precluded its defense. The judgment was reversed and remanded for a new trial due to the prejudicial admission of evidence concerning an employee's death, which was deemed to have unfairly influenced the jury's decision on property damages. The court also provided guidance on several other issues for the retrial, including jury instructions and the handling of third-party claims.

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Upjohn Company appealed judgments in favor of Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. and MiChris, Inc. after a fire destroyed a building insulated with Upjohn's product. Plaintiffs sued for strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and fraud, alleging inadequate warnings about the insulation's flammability. The appellate court found that while the statute of limitations could apply, the jury's finding of fraud and concealment by Upjohn precluded its defense. The judgment was reversed and remanded for a new trial due to the prejudicial admission of evidence concerning an employee's death, which was deemed to have unfairly influenced the jury's decision on property damages. The court also provided guidance on several other issues for the retrial, including jury instructions and the handling of third-party claims.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co. workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co. case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co. Case Analysis

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.