CompFox AI Summary
This case involves applicant Rachel Wells seeking reconsideration of a prior Board decision that granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. Previously, the Board found the defendant's Utilization Review (UR) process was timely, rescinded an administrative law judge's award, and remanded for further proceedings. Wells now asks the Board to vacate that decision and deny the defendant's initial petition. The Board reviewed the matter and, for the reasons stated in its prior opinion, denied Wells's Petition for Reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves applicant Rachel Wells seeking reconsideration of a prior Board decision that granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. Previously, the Board found the defendant's Utilization Review (UR) process was timely, rescinded an administrative law judge's award, and remanded for further proceedings. Wells now asks the Board to vacate that decision and deny the defendant's initial petition. The Board reviewed the matter and, for the reasons stated in its prior opinion, denied Wells's Petition for Reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.