Home/Case Law/Ramirez v. State
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCriminal Appeal

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Rosendo Guzman Ramirez was convicted of burglary of a vehicle after being found on a freight train in El Paso, Texas, along with other individuals. Railroad security officers discovered a broken seal on a trailer where Ramirez and others were apprehended. The State argued that Ramirez's attempt to obtain a free ride constituted theft of service, thereby demonstrating intent to commit theft for the burglary charge. However, the court reversed the conviction, clarifying that a freight train does not provide service for compensation. Therefore, riding-the-rails does not fulfill the criteria for theft of service under Texas Penal Code Section 31.04(a), and the intent to commit theft, a necessary element for burglary of a vehicle under Section 30.04, was not proven. The case was remanded for entry of a judgment of not guilty.

Ramirez v. State is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Rosendo Guzman Ramirez was convicted of burglary of a vehicle after being found on a freight train in El Paso, Texas, along with other individuals. Railroad security officers discovered a broken seal on a trailer where Ramirez and others were apprehended. The State argued that Ramirez's attempt to obtain a free ride constituted theft of service, thereby demonstrating intent to commit theft for the burglary charge. However, the court reversed the conviction, clarifying that a freight train does not provide service for compensation. Therefore, "riding-the-rails" does not fulfill the criteria for theft of service under Texas Penal Code Section 31.04(a), and the intent to commit theft, a necessary element for burglary of a vehicle under Section 30.04, was not proven. The case was remanded for entry of a judgment of not guilty.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ramirez v. State workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Ramirez v. State case law summary from Court of Appeals of Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Ramirez v. State Case Analysis

Ramirez v. State is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.