Home/Case Law/RAYMOND GONZALEZ vs. ALBERTSONS, permissibly self-insured, ALBERTSONS HOLDINGS FULLERTON
Regular DecisionRemoval

RAYMOND GONZALEZ vs. ALBERTSONS, permissibly self-insured, ALBERTSONS HOLDINGS FULLERTON

Filed: Jan 03, 2018
Anaheim
ADJ10544664

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant Albertson's Petition for Removal. The Board found that removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only when substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result, and reconsideration would be inadequate. The WCJ's report indicated the defendant's petition was denied due to procedural deficiency (failure to attach the subpoena) and that no substantive ruling was made that would warrant removal. The Board agreed that the defendant did not demonstrate the necessary prejudice for this exceptional relief.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant Albertson's Petition for Removal. The Board found that removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only when substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result, and reconsideration would be inadequate. The WCJ's report indicated the defendant's petition was denied due to procedural deficiency (failure to attach the subpoena) and that no substantive ruling was made that would warrant removal. The Board agreed that the defendant did not demonstrate the necessary prejudice for this exceptional relief.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.