CompFox AI Summary
The Board granted reconsideration to further develop the record regarding the applicant's permanent and stationary (P&S) date. The WCJ's reliance on medical opinions was flawed because Dr. Lavigna lacked a complete medical history, not accounting for a subsequent motor vehicle accident. Dr. Jamasbi's opinion also failed to adequately address causation and consider all contributing factors. Consequently, the Board rescinded the original award and returned the case for further proceedings and a new decision.
RAYSHAWN LAMBERT vs. AEROTEK/ALLEGIS GROUP, INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Board granted reconsideration to further develop the record regarding the applicant's permanent and stationary (P&S) date. The WCJ's reliance on medical opinions was flawed because Dr. Lavigna lacked a complete medical history, not accounting for a subsequent motor vehicle accident. Dr. Jamasbi's opinion also failed to adequately address causation and consider all contributing factors. Consequently, the Board rescinded the original award and returned the case for further proceedings and a new decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.