CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior award and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the reasonable value of services provided by lien claimant Wilshire Surgicenter, Inc. The Board found that neither party presented sufficient evidence according to the precedent set in Kunz v. Patterson Floor Coverings, Inc. regarding usual fees accepted by providers. The case will be reheard to allow both parties to develop evidence regarding the usual fees accepted by providers in the geographic area for the services rendered.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior award and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the reasonable value of services provided by lien claimant Wilshire Surgicenter, Inc. The Board found that neither party presented sufficient evidence according to the precedent set in Kunz v. Patterson Floor Coverings, Inc. regarding usual fees accepted by providers. The case will be reheard to allow both parties to develop evidence regarding the usual fees accepted by providers in the geographic area for the services rendered.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.