CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a workers' compensation award due to alleged overlooked medical evidence. The applicant contends that the judge failed to fully consider Dr. Markovitz's report, particularly regarding the need for wrist supports and their impact on disability rating. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the medical evidence deficient on whether wrist brace usage constitutes a factor of disability. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record on this specific issue and to defer findings on permanent disability and attorney fees.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a workers' compensation award due to alleged overlooked medical evidence. The applicant contends that the judge failed to fully consider Dr. Markovitz's report, particularly regarding the need for wrist supports and their impact on disability rating. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the medical evidence deficient on whether wrist brace usage constitutes a factor of disability. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record on this specific issue and to defer findings on permanent disability and attorney fees.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.