Home/Case Law/Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America

Filed: Aug 02, 2012
ADJ4348361 (STK 0170600)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns defendant American Protection Insurance Company's (APIC) petition for contribution from Travelers Insurance Company for benefits paid to applicant Richard Horton. The Arbitrator denied APIC's petition, finding contribution was precluded because a prior stipulated award did not grant new and distinct benefits. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the Arbitrator's decision. The Board determined that a supplemental award granting new and further permanent disability, including a psyche injury claim, constituted new and distinct benefits subject to contribution, even if the original award was time-barred. The matter was returned for further proceedings to determine the extent of APIC's contribution rights.

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns defendant American Protection Insurance Company's (APIC) petition for contribution from Travelers Insurance Company for benefits paid to applicant Richard Horton. The Arbitrator denied APIC's petition, finding contribution was precluded because a prior stipulated award did not grant "new and distinct benefits." The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the Arbitrator's decision. The Board determined that a supplemental award granting new and further permanent disability, including a psyche injury claim, constituted new and distinct benefits subject to contribution, even if the original award was time-barred. The matter was returned for further proceedings to determine the extent of APIC's contribution rights.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America Case Analysis

Richard Horton vs. Crown Cork and Seal, American Protection Insurance Company, BROADSPIRE, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.