CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant Robert Baker's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed in pro per without proof of service on all adverse parties, including his own attorney. The petition also failed to meet the requirements of Appeals Board Rule 10856 by not providing a specific offer of proof for newly discovered evidence or fraud. Consequently, the Board found the petition defective on multiple grounds.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant Robert Baker's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed in pro per without proof of service on all adverse parties, including his own attorney. The petition also failed to meet the requirements of Appeals Board Rule 10856 by not providing a specific offer of proof for newly discovered evidence or fraud. Consequently, the Board found the petition defective on multiple grounds.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.