Home/Case Law/ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES
Regular DecisionRemoval

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES

Filed: Oct 08, 2019
Sacramento
ADJ12084466

CompFox AI Summary

Applicant claimed a psyche injury from his employment as a deputy sheriff, alleging multiple events including witnessing a civilian suicide. The WCJ ordered defendant to produce dashboard camera footage of the suicide after applicant complied with Public Records Act (PRA) procedures, and allowed applicant to then inform the QME of the video's contents. Defendant sought removal, arguing the order bypasses the PRA's requirement for agencies to determine record disclosability and causes irreparable harm. The WCAB granted removal, rescinded the order, and returned the matter for the WCJ to ensure proper PRA procedures are followed, allowing proper determination of record disclosability before release.

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Applicant claimed a psyche injury from his employment as a deputy sheriff, alleging multiple events including witnessing a civilian suicide. The WCJ ordered defendant to produce dashboard camera footage of the suicide after applicant complied with Public Records Act (PRA) procedures, and allowed applicant to then inform the QME of the video's contents. Defendant sought removal, arguing the order bypasses the PRA's requirement for agencies to determine record disclosability and causes irreparable harm. The WCAB granted removal, rescinded the order, and returned the matter for the WCJ to ensure proper PRA procedures are followed, allowing proper determination of record disclosability before release.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES workers compensation case in Sacramento. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES case law summary from Sacramento. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES Case Analysis

ROBERT CLARK vs. COUNTY OF PLACER, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By INTERCARE HOLDINGS INSURANCE SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Sacramento. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.