CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding a $100%$ permanent disability award for a hand surgeon. The defendant argued the award was unsupported because the panel QME did not apply apportionment under SB 899. The Board found the defendant failed to meet its burden to establish apportionment by showing other contributing factors. Furthermore, the Board affirmed the P&S date of February 10, 2010, based on ongoing medical treatment and physician findings.
ROBERT COSTARELLA vs. ROBERT J. COSTARELLA, M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding a $100%$ permanent disability award for a hand surgeon. The defendant argued the award was unsupported because the panel QME did not apply apportionment under SB 899. The Board found the defendant failed to meet its burden to establish apportionment by showing other contributing factors. Furthermore, the Board affirmed the P&S date of February 10, 2010, based on ongoing medical treatment and physician findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.