Home/Case Law/ROBERT DOODY vs. MERLI CONCRETE PUMPING COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION
Regular Decision

ROBERT DOODY vs. MERLI CONCRETE PUMPING COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION

Filed: Jun 30, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2488411 (RIV 0017588)

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant Merli Concrete Pumping Company petitioned for removal, arguing insufficient discovery time regarding the applicant's petition for third-party credit and restitution. However, prior to the Appeals Board ruling on the petition, the parties jointly requested and the judge granted a continuance off the trial calendar. Consequently, the defendant's petition for removal became moot. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant Merli Concrete Pumping Company petitioned for removal, arguing insufficient discovery time regarding the applicant's petition for third-party credit and restitution. However, prior to the Appeals Board ruling on the petition, the parties jointly requested and the judge granted a continuance off the trial calendar. Consequently, the defendant's petition for removal became moot. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBERT DOODY vs. MERLI CONCRETE PUMPING COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox