Home/Case Law/ROBERT FASSETT vs. BRUCE K. HALL CONSTRUCTION, ACE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ROBERT FASSETT vs. BRUCE K. HALL CONSTRUCTION, ACE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Mar 03, 2024
Fresno
ADJ6547120

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final, interlocutory order. Such procedural or evidentiary decisions, including those concerning medical evaluations and travel arrangements, do not determine substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petition for removal was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Any challenges to the location of a deposition should first be presented to the Workers' Compensation Judge.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final, interlocutory order. Such procedural or evidentiary decisions, including those concerning medical evaluations and travel arrangements, do not determine substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petition for removal was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Any challenges to the location of a deposition should first be presented to the Workers' Compensation Judge.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROBERT FASSETT vs. BRUCE K. HALL CONSTRUCTION, ACE INSURANCE COMPANY (2024) – Fresno | CompFox