Home/Case Law/ROBERT HARLOW vs. STEINY & COMPANY, CNA INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular Decision

ROBERT HARLOW vs. STEINY & COMPANY, CNA INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 25, 2008
San Francisco
PAS 0016590, PAS 0016591

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant filing a second petition for reconsideration after his initial petition was denied. The Appeals Board dismissed the second petition because successive petitions are impermissibly allowed. The applicant's proper recourse for challenging the Board's decision is a writ of review to the Court of Appeal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant filing a second petition for reconsideration after his initial petition was denied. The Appeals Board dismissed the second petition because successive petitions are impermissibly allowed. The applicant's proper recourse for challenging the Board's decision is a writ of review to the Court of Appeal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.