Home/Case Law/ROBERT HYATT vs. UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ROBERT HYATT vs. UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE

Filed: Dec 13, 2011
San Diego
ADJ6764998

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, amending the prior order to establish CIGA's standing to file an application. However, the Board affirmed the finding that CIGA's application was barred by the statute of limitations. This decision means CIGA can initiate claims as a party in interest but must do so within the statutory deadlines for filing. CIGA's liability is limited to "covered claims" related to the employer's insurer's insolvency.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted CIGA's Petition for Reconsideration, amending the prior order to establish CIGA's standing to file an application. However, the Board affirmed the finding that CIGA's application was barred by the statute of limitations. This decision means CIGA can initiate claims as a party in interest but must do so within the statutory deadlines for filing. CIGA's liability is limited to "covered claims" related to the employer's insurer's insolvency.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.