Home/Case Law/Robert Imrie vs. SaveMart Supermarkets
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

Robert Imrie vs. SaveMart Supermarkets

Filed: Jan 03, 2018
Santa Rosa
ADJ9008198

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied SaveMart Supermarkets' Petition for Removal because the employer failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm from the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) order to further develop the record. The WCJ found that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) report was not substantial evidence as it relied on facts that were proven untrue during the hearing. The Appeals Board agreed with the WCJ that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if the matter proceeded to a final decision adverse to the employer.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied SaveMart Supermarkets' Petition for Removal because the employer failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm from the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) order to further develop the record. The WCJ found that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) report was not substantial evidence as it relied on facts that were proven untrue during the hearing. The Appeals Board agreed with the WCJ that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if the matter proceeded to a final decision adverse to the employer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.