Home/Case Law/Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge

Filed: Jul 28, 2022
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
M2021-00072-COA-R3-CV

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County regarding a dispute between a country music artist's former manager (Robert L. Baker) and the artist (Brett Eldredge) and his business entities. The manager sued for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and inducement of breach of contract, alleging underpayment after a proposed change in commission structure. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the contract was mutually modified. The trial court granted summary judgment, finding that the manager's acceptance of modified payments for 17 months without protest demonstrated an unambiguous course of dealing and mutual assent to the contract modification. The Court of Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the summary judgment, agreeing that the manager's objective conduct manifested assent, thereby precluding claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and inducement.

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County regarding a dispute between a country music artist's former manager (Robert L. Baker) and the artist (Brett Eldredge) and his business entities. The manager sued for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and inducement of breach of contract, alleging underpayment after a proposed change in commission structure. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the contract was mutually modified. The trial court granted summary judgment, finding that the manager's acceptance of modified payments for 17 months without protest demonstrated an unambiguous course of dealing and mutual assent to the contract modification. The Court of Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the summary judgment, agreeing that the manager's objective conduct manifested assent, thereby precluding claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and inducement.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge Case Analysis

Robert L. Baker v. Brett Eldredge is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.