CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a dispute over the timeliness of an Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination. The applicant argued the IMR was untimely, granting the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) jurisdiction to review the medical treatment dispute. The WCAB reviewed the evidence and found no clear and convincing proof that the director violated statutory timelines in issuing the IMR determination. Therefore, the WCAB affirmed the original decision finding the IMR to be timely.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a dispute over the timeliness of an Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination. The applicant argued the IMR was untimely, granting the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) jurisdiction to review the medical treatment dispute. The WCAB reviewed the evidence and found no clear and convincing proof that the director violated statutory timelines in issuing the IMR determination. Therefore, the WCAB affirmed the original decision finding the IMR to be timely.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.