Home/Case Law/RONALD PIERCE vs. CITY OF TULARE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

RONALD PIERCE vs. CITY OF TULARE

Filed: Dec 07, 2012
Fresno
ADJ7274196

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Ronald Pierce, requested to appear telephonically for trial as an ADA accommodation, which the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) denied, citing due process and the need to observe witnesses. The Appeals Board dismissed Pierce's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's ruling was not a final decision. The Board also denied his Petition for Removal, finding no significant prejudice as the substantive issue was to be decided on briefs. Pierce was also advised that he does not have a right to free legal counsel.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Ronald Pierce, requested to appear telephonically for trial as an ADA accommodation, which the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) denied, citing due process and the need to observe witnesses. The Appeals Board dismissed Pierce's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's ruling was not a final decision. The Board also denied his Petition for Removal, finding no significant prejudice as the substantive issue was to be decided on briefs. Pierce was also advised that he does not have a right to free legal counsel.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.