Home/Case Law/ROSALIO NAVA vs. JOSEPH GALLO CATTLE COMPANY, SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular Decision

ROSALIO NAVA vs. JOSEPH GALLO CATTLE COMPANY, SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jun 12, 2014
Fresno
ADJ9012109

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Petition for Removal in the case of Rosalio Nava v. Joseph Gallo Cattle Company; Seabright Insurance Company. The WCAB adopted the Administrative Law Judge's report, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by WCAB Rule 10843. Consequently, the petition for removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Petition for Removal in the case of Rosalio Nava v. Joseph Gallo Cattle Company; Seabright Insurance Company. The WCAB adopted the Administrative Law Judge's report, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm as required by WCAB Rule 10843. Consequently, the petition for removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ROSALIO NAVA vs. JOSEPH GALLO CATTLE COMPANY, SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY (2014) – Fresno | CompFox