CompFox AI Summary
This case involved a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision denying an applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant claimed cumulative injury to multiple body parts and psyche due to her employment. The Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found the applicant's testimony not credible and the treating doctor's opinion unsubstantiated by substantial evidence due to inconsistencies with the record. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, agreeing that the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof for demonstrating industrial causation.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involved a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision denying an applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant claimed cumulative injury to multiple body parts and psyche due to her employment. The Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found the applicant's testimony not credible and the treating doctor's opinion unsubstantiated by substantial evidence due to inconsistencies with the record. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, agreeing that the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof for demonstrating industrial causation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.