Home/Case Law/SALVADOR LANDIN vs. STAFFMARK INVESTMENT, CHARTIS SAN DIEGO
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SALVADOR LANDIN vs. STAFFMARK INVESTMENT, CHARTIS SAN DIEGO

Filed: Mar 28, 2011
ADJ7233959 ADJ7233792

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an attorney's petition for reconsideration after an administrative law judge (WCJ) ordered them to pay defendant costs and a $$500$ sanction. The applicant's attorney argued they did not have adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the sanctions. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's orders, and returned the matter for further proceedings because the orders were issued without proper notice and opportunity to present a defense, violating due process. The Board emphasized that sanctions require proper procedure, including a notice of intent and a hearing.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an attorney's petition for reconsideration after an administrative law judge (WCJ) ordered them to pay defendant costs and a $$500$ sanction. The applicant's attorney argued they did not have adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the sanctions. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's orders, and returned the matter for further proceedings because the orders were issued without proper notice and opportunity to present a defense, violating due process. The Board emphasized that sanctions require proper procedure, including a notice of intent and a hearing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SALVADOR LANDIN vs. STAFFMARK INVESTMENT, CHARTIS SAN DIEGO (2011) – | CompFox