Home/Case Law/SAMUEL RAMIREZ vs. AEROTEK/ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE administered by ESIS, STAFFING NETWORK/CIGA by its servicing agent SEDGWICK CMS for LUMBERMANS UNDERWRITING in liquidation, ANTHONY INTERNATIONAL INC. Insured by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES insured by XL INSURANCE AMERICA administered by SEDG
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

SAMUEL RAMIREZ vs. AEROTEK/ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE administered by ESIS, STAFFING NETWORK/CIGA by its servicing agent SEDGWICK CMS for LUMBERMANS UNDERWRITING in liquidation, ANTHONY INTERNATIONAL INC. Insured by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES insured by XL INSURANCE AMERICA administered by SEDG

Filed: Jan 17, 2023
Anaheim
ADJ9682348

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address CIGA's contention that the statute of limitations did not bar the applicant's amendment of his claim from a specific injury to a cumulative trauma injury. The Board found that the amended application related back to the original timely filed application, as both parties understood the injury was cumulative, and benefits were provided accordingly. The presence of multiple defendants, including CIGA, does not preclude amendments to conform to proof, especially given Labor Code Section 5500.5 concerning cumulative trauma liability. Therefore, the Board amended the original order to find that the amended application alleging cumulative trauma was not time-barred.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address CIGA's contention that the statute of limitations did not bar the applicant's amendment of his claim from a specific injury to a cumulative trauma injury. The Board found that the amended application related back to the original timely filed application, as both parties understood the injury was cumulative, and benefits were provided accordingly. The presence of multiple defendants, including CIGA, does not preclude amendments to conform to proof, especially given Labor Code Section 5500.5 concerning cumulative trauma liability. Therefore, the Board amended the original order to find that the amended application alleging cumulative trauma was not time-barred.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.