CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a defendant's petition to set aside a stipulated award of 56% permanent disability due to alleged mutual mistake of fact. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the record was inadequate to review the WCJ's decision, which denied the defendant's petition. Specifically, no formal minutes, evidence, or stipulations were properly documented, preventing a meaningful review. Therefore, the Board rescinded the WCJ's order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision compliant with record-keeping requirements.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a defendant's petition to set aside a stipulated award of 56% permanent disability due to alleged mutual mistake of fact. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the record was inadequate to review the WCJ's decision, which denied the defendant's petition. Specifically, no formal minutes, evidence, or stipulations were properly documented, preventing a meaningful review. Therefore, the Board rescinded the WCJ's order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision compliant with record-keeping requirements.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.